2004-09-16

'Far graver than Vietnam'

The closing lines of the article, from the Guardian:

General Hoare believes from the information he has received that "a decision has been made" to attack Fallujah "after the first Tuesday in November. That's the cynical part of it - after the election. The signs are all there."

He compares any such planned attack to the late Syrian dictator Hafez al-Asad's razing of the rebel city of Hama. "You could flatten it," said Hoare. "US military forces would prevail, casualties would be high, there would be inconclusive results with respect to the bad guys, their leadership would escape, and civilians would be caught in the middle. I hate that phrase collateral damage. And they talked about dancing in the street, a beacon for democracy."

General Odom remarked that the tension between the Bush administration and the senior military officers over Iraqi was worse than any he has ever seen with any previous government, including Vietnam. "I've never seen it so bad between the office of the secretary of defence and the military. There's a significant majority believing this is a disaster. The two parties whose interests have been advanced have been the Iranians and al-Qaida. Bin Laden could argue with some cogency that our going into Iraq was the equivalent of the Germans in Stalingrad. They defeated themselves by pouring more in there. Tragic."


Also, does anyone else see Osama becoming a sort of Emmanuel Goldstein/3-Minutes-Hate sort of character, à la 1984? I mean, this would imply that Bush actually started talking about him again, but he fits the profile: vague shadowy character who is 'the enemy'. Just pull him out when you need to focus attention on something other than what's going on at the moment. Then start to get office workers to assemble once a day to denounce him. It'll be great.

No comments: